Is Your CEO Secretly Holding Your Company Back?
CEO underperformance is one of the biggest silent threats to long-term business success. It doesn’t just affect financial performance—it seeps into company culture, talent retention, investor confidence, and even the organization’s strategic position. Yet many boards hesitate to act, either out of loyalty, fear of disruption, or because the decline is gradual and difficult to pinpoint.
A recent study by Harvard Business Review estimates that underperforming CEOs cost S&P 1500 companies a staggering $291 billion annually in lost shareholder value. Recognizing the warning signs early can save a company from long-term damage.
I was inspired by an insightful article from Russell Reynolds Associates and wanted to expand on the critical triggers of CEO underperformance, how boards should respond, and how companies can proactively prevent leadership failures. Let’s dive in.
In today’s volatile business landscape, organizations are facing unprecedented challenges in managing their supply chains. The COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and rapidly evolving consumer demands have exposed the vulnerabilities of traditional, fragmented supply chains. As a veteran supply chain consultant who has guided numerous organizations through transformational changes, I’ve witnessed firsthand how supply chain integration has become not just an operational necessity but a strategic imperative for survival and growth.
Five Red Flags That Demand Immediate Board Action
1. Consistently Poor Financial Performance
Numbers don’t lie. If financial targets are repeatedly missed, shareholder value is declining, or profitability is stagnating, the CEO’s leadership must be questioned. A struggling financial position alone isn’t always a failure indicator—but the lack of a turnaround strategy is.
2. Market Share Erosion
Competition is inevitable, but if your company is losing market share without a recovery plan, it signals weak leadership. Either the company’s strategic positioning is flawed, or the CEO lacks the adaptability to navigate market shifts.
3. Ethical or Legal Issues
Ethical failures—whether in governance, compliance, or corporate culture—can cause long-lasting reputational damage. If a CEO’s integrity is under scrutiny, the board must act swiftly to avoid a broader crisis.
4. Failure to Achieve Strategic Goals
A CEO’s primary role is to execute the company’s vision and strategic goals. If key business initiatives continuously fall short, whether due to misalignment, poor decision-making, or execution failures, leadership is a major issue.
5. Inability to Adapt to Market Changes
Disruptive markets require agile leaders. If a CEO cannot adjust to technological advancements, evolving consumer behavior, or regulatory shifts, the business will inevitably fall behind.
15 Subtle Yet Critical Indicators of CEO Underperformance
1. Consistently Poor Financial Performance
Numbers don’t lie. If financial targets are repeatedly missed, shareholder value is declining, or profitability is stagnating, the CEO’s leadership must be questioned. A struggling financial position alone isn’t always a failure indicator—but the lack of a turnaround strategy is.
2. Market Share Erosion
Competition is inevitable, but if your company is losing market share without a recovery plan, it signals weak leadership. Either the company’s strategic positioning is flawed, or the CEO lacks the adaptability to navigate market shifts.
3. Ethical or Legal Issues
Ethical failures—whether in governance, compliance, or corporate culture—can cause long-lasting reputational damage. If a CEO’s integrity is under scrutiny, the board must act swiftly to avoid a broader crisis.
4. Failure to Achieve Strategic Goals
A CEO’s primary role is to execute the company’s vision and strategic goals. If key business initiatives continuously fall short, whether due to misalignment, poor decision-making, or execution failures, leadership is a major issue.
5. Inability to Adapt to Market Changes
Disruptive markets require agile leaders. If a CEO cannot adjust to technological advancements, evolving consumer behavior, or regulatory shifts, the business will inevitably fall behind.
Beyond the major red flags, underperformance often starts with small, subtle signs that escalate over time. Boards must stay alert to these:
6. Lack of Accountability
A CEO who deflects blame, avoids tough decisions, or refuses to own up to mistakes fosters a toxic blame culture across the company.
7. Ineffectiveness in Crisis Management
A CEO’s leadership is truly tested during crises. A lack of decisiveness, transparency, or ability to rally teams in difficult times is a serious weakness.
8. Declining Company Culture
Toxic work environments don’t appear overnight. If employee morale is dropping, turnover is increasing, and disengagement is rising, the CEO’s leadership may be failing.
9. Loss of Confidence from Stakeholders
When investors, customers, and senior executives start doubting the CEO’s vision, it’s a clear warning sign that should not be ignored.
10. Poor Communication Skills
A CEO who struggles to articulate a clear vision, align teams, or engage with stakeholders creates instability across the organization.
11. Strained Board-CEO Relationship
If trust between the board and CEO is eroding due to conflicts over strategy, governance, or decision-making, it’s time to reassess the leadership fit.
12. Loss of Key Talent
Top executives rarely leave strong leadership teams. If key talent is exiting at an alarming rate, there’s likely an issue at the top.
13. Lack of Improvement Despite Intervention
If a CEO fails to improve even after board interventions, executive coaching, or additional support, the company may need a leadership change.
14. Repeatedly Ignoring Feedback
Great leaders are coachable. A CEO who refuses to accept performance feedback or resists necessary change is unlikely to improve.
15. Mismatch with the Company’s Growth Stage
A startup CEO might struggle to scale a company, just as a corporate CEO may lack the agility needed in a high-growth environment. If the business evolves but the CEO does not, misalignment is inevitable.
Why Boards Hesitate (And Why They Shouldn’t)
Even when these warning signs are evident, many boards hesitate to act due to:
Fear of destabilizing the company
Uncertainty about suitable successors
Concern over shareholder reactions
Personal loyalty to the CEO
Lack of a structured performance evaluation framework
However, delaying action is often more damaging than making a tough decision. The longer a weak CEO remains in place, the harder it becomes to reverse course.
How Boards Should Respond
A proactive and structured approach to CEO evaluation and succession planning is essential. Here’s what boards should do:
1. Establish an Ongoing CEO Evaluation Framework
CEO performance should be reviewed regularly with objective KPIs aligned to business strategy. This prevents issues from going unchecked for too long.
2. Build a Strong Succession Pipeline
Boards must actively develop internal talent and maintain an updated list of external candidates. A well-prepared board always has a transition plan.
3. Encourage Open Boardroom Discussions
Directors should feel empowered to voice concerns early, rather than waiting until underperformance becomes undeniable.
4. Act Decisively When Change is Needed
When underperformance is clear, boards must take swift action—whether providing targeted support, initiating leadership changes, or appointing an interim CEO.
5. Align Leadership with Future Business Needs
The CEO who brought the company to where it is today may not be the right leader for tomorrow. Boards must ensure that CEO skill sets align with the company’s next phase of growth and transformation.
Final Thoughts
CEO underperformance is rarely a sudden event—it’s a gradual decline that boards often recognize too late. By identifying warning signs early, fostering open board discussions, and maintaining a proactive succession strategy, organizations can ensure strong leadership continuity.
No board wants to confront an underperforming CEO, but addressing leadership failures is one of the most critical responsibilities of corporate governance. The best-run companies don’t just react to CEO failure—they anticipate and prevent it.
What do you think? Have you witnessed CEO underperformance firsthand? How was it handled? Share your insights in the comments!
(Credit to the original authors: David Krahe, Margot McShane, Scott Smith, and Sarah Flören from Russell Reynolds Associates, whose insights formed the foundation of this discussion.)